This may be a futile excercise, but I will try to point out the fallacies in your logic.
DQ wrote:So the Bureaucrats and Babu's were thinking about their own kith and kin.
Wrong. When India got independence the priority was higher education, esp in technology as good India doesnt have any good universtires . This prompted Nehru, who was influenced by socialism, to establish large PSU's by creating infrastructure and IIT's, which are still considered the best in the world, to produce quality engineers.
All Indians who were 12th pass could apply for these Instituitions and not just the kin and kith of babus. Today majority of the students who are admitted into IIT's are middle class people and admission is based on merit.
Independence was won for one and all was it not ?
Yep and so are the technological universities.
So post independence, those ruled who licked the asses of the rulers, got themselves educated in foreign universities, improved the quality of education for the privelaged lot.
YOu are assuming that higher education is only for the privilaged, nothing can be far from truth. Just take a look at the people studying in IIT's or IIM's. There wouldnt have been a Infosys or a Sun microsystems if ther was only primary education in India and not the IIT's for higher education.
And some of the foreign educated people are :
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi: Studied Law in UK, left lucrative career to fight for independance
Jawaharlal Nehru: Law in UK, freedom fighter.
Prakasham pantulu : Law in UK, donated millions to the masses and became freedom fighter and eventually CM of AP. Died a poor man without anything to eat (being CM of AP)
Why did they have to go to UK? To get a better education as there were no good universities in India.
Post independance, those who were educated in foreign lands never returned home to do a stoopid government job.
These privelaged got educated and started running corrupt govts.
The educated became privilaged and not the other way. They did not run government, the politicians who are elected by these uneducated masses run the govt.
When the money did not go where it should have, the poor lost out, the only options left to them was
1. Fight - Either crime or Naxalism
2. Serve these privelaged.
mmmm... naxalites are very educated people after all their idealogy is derived from marxism/leninism. Primary education has got nothing do with naxalism.
As for serving the privilaged, I dont see anything wrong in it. Please explain.
The only challenge to them was from
1. The missonary schools - so where possible they went about defaming these schools by saying this is the source of relegious conversion
Just take a look at the list of top schools or any good school in any city, village, basti - they all start with a st. XXXXXXX. What does that tell you?
Missionaries are a source of conversion, not missionary schools. Atleast I have never heard of such allegation, please point to any such news report (credible one).
2. The minority institutions - Targetting them as being jihadis or qualityless
The two major contributions to the education system pre independance were sidelined. The Aligarh Muslim University (was sidelined). The Osmania university (Which was secular, as it was run under the Nizam) was taken over by these Babus.
AMU sidelined?

When, where?
You still want Nizam to rule hyderabad, dont you? Dont you know that
all universities in India are under government and there is nothing special about OU? OU is still a reputed university in AP.
The prefrential treatment meant that the minorities got sidelined.
Is there a special policy that minorities should not be admitted to universities? Can you point me to any such malpractice or preferential treatment given to majority community? We can pursue the case in court.
Btw, I am sure youy heard about
minority instituitions where minorities get special treatment. Unfortunately there are no such institutes for majority community.
Where is the govt wrong in bringing reservations, to uplift these people.
Yes reservation again should not be abused as the rest of the system is. Reservation if reaches the needy will bring about a more prosperous India.
Reservationsa are meant for people who were oppressed, esp in hindu community where dalits were
not allowed to pursue education, as a direct result of it they lagged behind the majority community. To bring them on par with the forward castes reservation was introduced. Tell me, pray, when was the muslim community or christians for that matter not allowed to study? If they are lagging behind in education, its their own doing. Dont even get me started on madrassas.
Anyway, not getting into the sensitive communal issue. Every child born in India should receive Education atleast upto Year 12. Every able Indian should take this as his / her responsibility to ensure that they help and fight for a govt that will bring about this!!!!
Finally something which we agree on. Yes, every citizen should have a right to education (equal oppurtunity, if I may say) and more money should be spent on this but donot blame higer education for lack of primary education.
PS: Please donot ask me to grow up in reply to this post. Kinda tired of it. Thanks.