DQ wrote:LOLZ!!!
Mayavi all your statement are based on one single book you have read.
I have enlisted multiple resources to the acheivements of the Nizam.
Instead of accepting that you have only one such resource to back your statement, you continue to call others Morons!!!
Huh!! Facts plz ????
A is an faggot/womaniser/miser.
A is a genius/great statesman.
Are the above statements complimentary, mutually exclusive or un-related statements?
Replace A with Nizam.
Its easier to teach an ingorant person
much easier if the person is a learned man
but even brahma cannot teach a half-knowledged person (dedh-dimags).
Shouldn't I be telling you this. Think ?
No. There are atleast three people here who agree with me that it applies to you. If I post the same on hemet thread, three more will support
Acceptance!!!! Of what, your absurd views ?
Like?
You did not answer my Query?
Did you ever mingle with the common man.
Did you visit various parts of the city.
What will you ask next, which all places I peed?
I dont have to answer your stupid personal questions not related to topic. And FYI, Hyderabad is not just a the city it is today, it extended till bedar in karnataka and was a big
state.
Look I am not a Nizam Idolizer etc, but yes credit should be give where it is due. Respect should be shown where due.
Yes, and if you go to page 2, CAD did mention that. He was the one who answered my question while you were engaged in meaningless drivel.
Also, can I assume that you have the same respect for Narendra modi as you have for nizam? Both are visionaries (Gujarat saw 10% growth during modi's regime and he took several initiative to privatise loss making PSU's - just like nizam ) and except for the 2002 massacre where 1000's of muslims were killed, he did only good for the state (just like nizam - except for razakkar's, he did only good). Munch on that.
Just because some lord or lady thought that Nizam made his women wear cotton, does not mean that he was a slandrer or a miser. And you go on to say that I am making presumptions.
She did not 'think' that he was miser, she said that for a fact and she was not the only one who said that, those common people who you mingled with will also tell you that he was a miser.
As for presumptions, you are the one making lots of ass-u-mptions, every source is propaganda and biased for you, but the sources you provided are un-biased and depict true history.
CAD, ASLI, MAYAVI - Never in this post have I mentioned that Nizam was a Perfect man, No.
But you dont want to hear his imperfections. What does that mean?
Harems in those days were very common - you wont belive that nizam had a harem.
Razakkars killed scores of people - you conveniently ignore it.
Nizam was a miser - so are many people, but wont agree.
Inspite of all this, he has done certian good things like supporting education etc and no one denied it.
It started with an incident in the life of Nizam.
For which someone replied that Nizam did not do anything for the Quam (Community)
For which I replied that there are a lot of contributions made by him, which are still enjoyed by the people. Some of his solutions have still not been paralleled.
He was a visionary.
I asked you to direct me to any available information or a good book as I was not aware of the visionary side of nizam and as a side note I said that Nizam had a huge harem to which you took offence, and I still dont understand why.
Donno what way it affected some of you, who tried to drag in relegion, his harem etc etc to prove that he was inept.
Nizam may have done several good things for people, but razakkars undid everything. So it is natural for anyone to ask about how hindus were treated during his regime, as many were killed towards the end.
No one tried to prove that he was inept. Infact having a 300 strength is surely not a sign of ineptitude nor is it a sign of bad governance. You ass-u-me-d things.
To which my reply was, if you want to see his image as an outsider you will not be able to draw the real picture.
You need to re live those times to understand what it means by visionary.
Apart from factual representations in books, in the Salar Jung library, and other libraries in Hyd, I also have the experience of speaking to various people who have lived in his times.
(If you go back a couple of posts it will show you that, I am speaking about Mir Osman Ali Khan. And I do not know about the others.)
And no one contested that. In the same token, you should also learn to appreciate other views, provided they are fair and balanced, and not strike it down as propaganda, esp if you dont have the proof to claim otherwise.
Btw, did you hear anything about the massacre of hindus at the hands of razakkars in the books in salar jung museum? no? does it mean that it didnt happen?
I will relate a few incidents in this post!! Probably that will drive some sense.
Yeah, and we will take it as gospel truth.
Ok so, were there any specific stories?
When you allege, make some facts known too!! Not an allegation left for presumptions
CAD bhai, please post some erotic stories
".... and then his highness, The VII Nizam, Sir Mir Osman Ali Khan entered the room which filled with the fragrance of Jasmine incense sticks. There she lay on the mukmul bed with her face covered with muslin ghungat. His highness sipped the french wine (supplied by our own CAD's friends relatives par dada) from the belgian-cut wine glass...."
....
