Naidu: stop blowing ur trumpet

[ZC]

Saradhi:



if ur son is stealing money from ur pocket and smoking/drinking/visiting whores, u try to be careful that he doesnt steal........and talk to him...........





or u will give him money, coz he will anyway go

[Saradhi]

thats what i am saying


ur expecting a slap means, what ur saying is crap

Yes, Agreed.



Paccha kaamerla rrogigi lookamantha pacchagaanee vuntundi mari.

If you are crapy, everybody looks like a craphy guy.

Better watch out your words and stick to the discussion politely.



Better watch out what you talk in public.

[ZC]

ha ha ha ha



u asked me to shut up previously..............



now ur behaving like a saint

[Saradhi]

Saradhi:

if ur son is stealing money from ur pocket and smoking/drinking/visiting whores, u try to be careful that he doesnt steal........and talk to him...........
or u will give him money, coz he will anyway go

I wont mind if my son takes alcohol.

I have my own ways of educating him and Controlling him not to take out of level that needs to be taken.



I dont like my son to become a criminal.

rather than I wont mind my son to be an alchoholic.



always some trade-off between bad and worrest.

[Saradhi]

ha ha ha ha

u asked me to shut up previously..............

now ur behaving like a saint

I said better to stop our mouths because it is a meaningless discussion.

I kicked myself also.

[ZC]

so, what ways Naidu has to stop people from drinking like u have ur ways of controlling ur son



doesnt he have the responsibility

[Saradhi]

so, what ways Naidu has to stop people from drinking like u have ur ways of controlling ur son

doesnt he have the responsibility

How many people he will stop?



Dont you have the responsibility of taking care of your health?



Naidu have to protect your health?



You drinks, Naidu have to stop it.

You goes and enjoy sex with girl having AIDs, Naidu have to stop it.

You murders some body and Naidu have to stop you.

You will spit on the road, Naidu have to come and clean it.

You puts garbage on the road, naidu have to come and clean it.



If naidu does everything, whats your responsibilty to this Country and this world?



Dont you have any Responsibilty?

[CtrlAltDel]

so, what ways Naidu has to stop people from drinking like u have ur ways of controlling ur son doesnt he have the responsibility

unless the IPC all over india makes it illegal to consume alchohol, he has no right to make people stop. even if he tries (like in prohibition) no one would listen.



like some islamic countries let india frist become alchohol free, then lets talk of CMs making people stop drinking.



abt controlling my family, IPC doesnt apply there i lay down the law and my son should obey me...as long as he is a minor. i wudn't worry abt him drinking, i wud just educate him on moderation

[Saradhi]

so, what ways Naidu has to stop people from drinking like u have ur ways of controlling ur son doesnt he have the responsibility

unless the IPC all over india makes it illegal to consume alchohol, he has no right to make people stop. even if he tries (like in prohibition) no one would listen.

like some islamic countries let india frist become alchohol free, then lets talk of CMs making people stop drinking.

abt controlling my family, IPC doesnt apply there i lay down the law and my son should obey me...as long as he is a minor. i wudn't worry abt him drinking, i wud just educate him on moderation

You are absolutely right.



As long as all states in Country implement(Atleast all south Indian Countries), the prohibition wont be a success.

Thats what I said, People never stopped taking alcohol in the time of prohibition.

Moreover they went so far to Yanamu, Bidar and sometimes they smuggled them and became criminals.

As somebody in this site said in the past, I like myself and my family memebrs to be controlled alchoholics rather then being criminals.

[Saradhi]

so, what ways Naidu has to stop people from drinking like u have ur ways of controlling ur son doesnt he have the responsibility

unless the IPC all over india makes it illegal to consume alchohol, he has no right to make people stop. even if he tries (like in prohibition) no one would listen.

like some islamic countries let india frist become alchohol free, then lets talk of CMs making people stop drinking.

abt controlling my family, IPC doesnt apply there i lay down the law and my son should obey me...as long as he is a minor. i wudn't worry abt him drinking, i wud just educate him on moderation

You are absolutely right.



As long as all states in Country implement(Atleast all south Indian States), the prohibition wont be a success.

Thats what I said, People never stopped taking alcohol in the time of prohibition.

Moreover they went so far to Yanamu, Bidar and sometimes they smuggled them and became criminals.

As somebody in this site said in the past, I like myself and my family memebrs to be controlled alchoholics rather then being criminals.

[Saradhi]

so, what ways Naidu has to stop people from drinking like u have ur ways of controlling ur son

doesnt he have the responsibility

I agree the fact that Government is supposed to have the Responsibilty and do the Development and it’s our right to demand it from Government.



But Remember Constitution gave you the Fundamental rights and at the same time attributed a lot of Fundamental Responsibilities. We always talk about our rights and never think about our Responsibilities. That’s where the actual problem lies.



Government is not the only one who should be responsible for the development of any area or any city. We as people of that city and region have some rights and at the same time have a lot of responsibilities to develop our own city or region and restrian and control ourselves in doing any anti-governmental activities.

[Saradhi]

http://in.rediff.com/money/2004/apr/16fdi.htm



India to be 2nd hottest FDI spot: UN survey



BS Markets Bureau in Mumbai | April 16, 2004 10:08 IST





India is set to be world's second hottest destination for foreign direct investment after China in the next four years, according to a UN-sponsored survey.



The United States has fallen to the third spot, while Thailand ranks fourth, followed by Poland and the Czech Republic (with equal points), Mexico and Malaysia (equal points) and the United Kingdom, Singapore and South Korea (ranked equal).



These results are based on a joint survey conducted by the UNCTAD in Geneva and by Corporate Location Magazine in London.



More than four out of five international location experts from around the world believe that FDI inflows are about to take off again, following three years of continuous decline in global FDI.



The survey, which polled 87 investment analysts worldwide, gave no figures for investment flows, but said volumes were seen improving after three poor years between 2001 and 2003.



For India and China, major FDIs are expected in the manufacturing sector. Prospects for motor vehicles and other transport equipment, machinery and equipment, chemicals and, to a lesser extent, electrical and electronic products, publishing and media service are brighter.



In the services sector, banking and insurance, business services, tourism, transport, computer-related services, retail and wholesale trade will take the lead in attracting FDI in the years to come, experts said in response to the survey questions.



Asia-Pacific garners the most optimism of all regions in terms of its future FDI prospects.



For both the short and medium term, 88 per cent of the respondents said they expected further improvement in those prospects, with the remaining 12 per cent anticipating that they will remain the same.



Not a single respondent predicted any downturn in the region's prospects.



According to an earlier UNCTAD report, FDI was $653 billion in 2003, unchanged over the previous year, and under half the record $1.4 trillion in 2000 when cross-border mergers and acquisitions were booming.



The survey findings predict that the most likely options for business expansion overseas are evenly divided between mergers and acquisitions (41 per cent) and greenfield investments (37 per cent). Other modes of international business expansion such as licensing and strategic alliances were mentioned by only 22 per cent of the respondents.



Despite the fact that the outsourcing of white collar jobs has become a major issue in many countries and dominates international business headlines, the respondents still see the bulk of relocation occurring in lower value-added corporate functions.



Processing activities, logistics and supply functions are the most frequently mentioned corporate functions likely to relocate abroad.







GAME ON.
COMPETETION IS ON AMONG STATES TO CAPTURE THIS FDI.
IF NAIDU COMES BACK TO POWER, I AM SURE HE WILL GET FAIR AMOUNT OF THIS FDI TO HYDERABAD.
GAME ON

[ZC]

http://www.hindu.com/2004/04/19/stories ... 630500.htm







Naidu

[CtrlAltDel]

hey ZC....why didnt u come for the meet....? where were u?

[Saradhi]

http://www.hindu.com/2004/04/19/stories/2004041902630500.htm



Naidu

Nice to see the study results.

But you need to remember the 3 states Kerala, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka have undertook Reforms a bit earlier than AP.



I gave you a lot of reasons for the slow progress of reforms in AP.



1) Lack of understanding and lack of support from the lower-grade bureaucrats. Note that in Kerala, most of these days, LEft front was in power and has the support of Unions for their reforms. Thast what I said, if they are doing it in their states, it is good and if others follows the same, it is wrong. Thats the problem with these unions and left parties. So kerala has the advantages on this matter. Unions are in the hands of Governemnt and reform process was smooth there.



See the way, Jayalalitha have destructed the Govt. Employee's strike in TN. We need to do the same. If Govt employees are not peforming well. _ their A** and privatise the things. Thats the best thing to do. It needs some courage.



2) The size of expenditure the state government would have to incur as a result of all these projects.



3) opposition parties to oppose the government on issues which it could gain popularity and to bring up popular opposition.



We need to learn from TN a lot on this issue. Even though whatever difference they have, all the parites comes closer if something is going against its state.



Karnataka has no oppostion in place literally. Janatha Dal smashed and BJP is making very small steps now and hence SM Krishna doesnt have any oppositon and can d whatever he wanted to.

[BB]

I have been reading the last two pages now and Oh my god. ZC you know nothing about policy planning. You talk shit. You want to debate about brandy shops and licenses they get, then listen. Go to any economist and ask him what is the best way to stop consumption of liquor. Prohibition of liqour is purely a populist measure rather than a good policy to stop it. The main reason why liqour ban is a serious problem is it increases the crime rate hugely unless it has never been consumed by lot of people and there is not much demand. That is the reason why Canada has lifted its ban on Marijuana and U.S. reduced the age limit of buying cigarettes from 21 to 18. I agree that liqour ban reduces the consumption of liqor, but only little and moreover many people will plunge into crime. Once this crime is established then the consumption or demand goes up again. This is what happened to teenagers in Canada regarding marijuana consumption. And don't just think of your kid getting addicted to liquor, think about kids of so many uneducated people who get involved in crime. Don't be mean. You by supporting liquor ban are not talking about welfare of people but only about welfare of your's.

And economically too this is very bad. You must have heard the stories of Bidar and how Maharastra and karnataka enjoyed the profits of liqour taxes while there was a liquor ban in AP. The best solution to this problem is to increase the number of lisences so that there is an open competition between liqour suppliers and increse the taxes hugely and carefully monitor liquor distribution. This will force out of business non-performing liqour suppliers and make it an oligopoly market so that new players find it very hard to enter the market. Note that liqour is a not a highly elastic good. So just increasing the taxes won't work because demand will not decrese much, and thereby increasing the profits of the suppliers. You have to first make it an open-competition market and then reduce it to oligopoly. This will ensure that only enough and exactly the same quantity required by the society is being supplied. And meanwhile government should implement policy that discourages liqour consumption by putting up ads on TV etc. This is what CBN precisely wanted to do. And that is why he payed more to AP liqour or whatever its name is. If you do not know something just don't go by populist slogans as these are often misleading. If you want more econmical and social reasons why licenses should be granted plz ask. I will be glad to answer. But plz just do not blatantly tell a statement without reason that makes no sense logically. Debate should be taken as a means to learn not to ridicule reality.

[akhilis2cool]

Debate should be taken as a means to learn not to ridicule reality.

everyones tried telling that to him man.....doesnt work

[Saradhi]

Debate should be taken as a means to learn not to ridicule reality.

everyones tried telling that to him man.....doesnt work

Well Said,



If no state in the Country have total prohibition, Why AP needs it?



If no state in the Country cant give Free Power, How can Congress can give in AP if it comes to power? People never forgets its Punjab incident of promising free power and backtracking on it. They need only power and they can do anyhitng to achieve it.



This is all to counter the Power of Naidu and his reforms and his way of ruling the Governement.



If he comes to pwer this time(Most of the opinion polls are telling the same), He will answer all his critics and there are NEWS that he is learning from his past mistakes and he has plans of having a firm Irrigation and Agriculture policy like the IT policy he has 5 years back and I am sure if those NEWS are correct, We are going to see a well developed AP state in all areas soon.



He is a smart politician and I hope he learns from his past mistakes.

Lets hope the best.

[CtrlAltDel]

I wish him all the best too...

so that he can get 5 more years to blow his trumpet!

[azazel]

thode dinau me doodh ka doodh aur paani ka paani pata chal jayega

[Saradhi]

thode dinau me doodh ka doodh aur paani ka paani pata chal jayega

Lets wait until May13th Evening.

[CtrlAltDel]

Lets wait until May13th Evening.

thats too long a time maan! in that interval, most politicians wud develop ulcers, waiting in tension!

why are the elections spread out this way? it just negates the advantages of the voting machines. these things actually give fast results....but they cant be declared till May13th...

[azazel]

yea

i dun think exit polls/opinion polls mean anything.. again just sellin news

[Saradhi]

Lets wait until May13th Evening.

thats too long a time maan! in that interval, most politicians wud develop ulcers, waiting in tension!
why are the elections spread out this way? it just negates the advantages of the voting machines. these things actually give fast results....but they cant be declared till May13th...

The thing is EC says the declaration of the results will influence the voting pattern of other areas in the Country which is fair enough.



Its true in some sense.

If you announce the results tomorrow for the 147 Constiuencies that voted today and if Congress-TRS alliance gets fair amount of seats due to Seeprate Telagana Seentiment, tomorrow Coasta and Rayalaseema Voters may give 95% support to TDP in the second phase because they oppose separate state and hence they want TDP to come back to power. Thats their argument and I think it make sense.

[CtrlAltDel]

The thing is EC says the declaration of the results will influence the voting pattern of other areas in the Country which is fair enough.

i can understand that. what i meant was, the elctions shud've been held close together say within 3-5 days and not over a month.