Moderator: The Moderator Team


Saradhi wrote:There were joyous scenes at the Multan Stadium as India secured its first Test win on Pakistani soil, beating the hosts by an innings and 52 runs on Thursday.
The Indians had not won any of their previous 20 Tests in Pakistan, losing five and drawing 15.
It was only India's second innings victory over Pakistan. The other was the inaugural Test between the two teams in New Delhi in 1952.
Sourav Ganguly and his boys are proving they are one of the best Indian teams ever. Victories in the West Indies, Australia, England and now Pakistan have seen them shed the tag of home tigers.
Join in the celebration and congratulate the Indian team on their historic victory!


rock_26iin wrote:Saradhi wrote:There were joyous scenes at the Multan Stadium as India secured its first Test win on Pakistani soil, beating the hosts by an innings and 52 runs on Thursday.
The Indians had not won any of their previous 20 Tests in Pakistan, losing five and drawing 15.
It was only India's second innings victory over Pakistan. The other was the inaugural Test between the two teams in New Delhi in 1952.
Sourav Ganguly and his boys are proving they are one of the best Indian teams ever. Victories in the West Indies, Australia, England and now Pakistan have seen them shed the tag of home tigers.
Join in the celebration and congratulate the Indian team on their historic victory!
U sound like a news reporter. Even ure article on Naidu, it sounded as if an editor of some newspaper wrote it.
Mayavi Morpheus wrote:Thats because the Naidu article was a editorial in 'The Pioneer'.
Saradhi wrote:Mayavi Morpheus wrote:Thats because the Naidu article was a editorial in 'The Pioneer'.
You are right.
Editorials are opinions of certain individuals and if you like it, you refers them.
Most people tend to refer to the editorials and NEWSitems if they want to support their views.
You need not reinvent the words and the cycle.
Just use them for your reference.
Nothing wrong in it.

Saradhi wrote:Mayavi Morpheus wrote:Thats because the Naidu article was a editorial in 'The Pioneer'.
You are right.
Editorials are opinions of certain individuals and if you like it, you refers them.
Most people tend to refer to the editorials and NEWSitems if they want to support their views.
You need not reinvent the words and the cycle.
Just use them for your reference.
Nothing wrong in it.


Saradhi wrote:Well Done Dravid, The unsung Hero Of Indian Cricket.
Writing in Wisden Asia Cricket a couple of months ago, Sanjay Manjrekar -a batsman in whose mould Dravid is cast - hailed Dravid as the fourth Indian batting great after Gavaskar, Viswanath and Tendulkar.
But I always rates Dravid above Tendulkar.
Tendulkar will perhaps end his career with a hundred hundreds. But as Indian cricket stands on the precipice of its own golden age, it must be remembered that Rahul Dravid has made the most difference.
What do you say Guys?

azazel wrote:Saradhi wrote:Well Done Dravid, The unsung Hero Of Indian Cricket.
Writing in Wisden Asia Cricket a couple of months ago, Sanjay Manjrekar -a batsman in whose mould Dravid is cast - hailed Dravid as the fourth Indian batting great after Gavaskar, Viswanath and Tendulkar.
But I always rates Dravid above Tendulkar.
Tendulkar will perhaps end his career with a hundred hundreds. But as Indian cricket stands on the precipice of its own golden age, it must be remembered that Rahul Dravid has made the most difference.
What do you say Guys?
Rahul Dravid has been the one consistently fighting it out in the last few months.. he's easily been India's best batsmen, barring none!
I wouldnt rate Rahul higher than Sachin as a batsman 'cept for his consistency .. when he is on song, ST can absolutely murder any attack ! Its just that Rahul reached his peak now, while Sachin da is beyond his
Saradhi wrote:For my opion, Sachin mastered the art of winning, but not saving the matches for his team.

Return to The Hyderabadi Planet!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests
{{todos[0].text}}