Sachin is not a Match Winner

[Singamsetty Rajesh]

After losing the VB series by Mamaoth runs, it is judged that Sachin Tendulkar is not a match winner, From the last couple of years, its is observed that India is wearing the shoes of South Africa, which was in a habit of losing all the important matches and final matches, till now india has lost 10 finals in last 11 final matches played. By the above record we can easily judge that tendulkar is not a match winner, he just can't play under pressre or in any important matches, he is either injured or gets out cheaply. The cricket fans memory is too short, they just forget about his failures if he scores a century in any legue match. I also think the team needs a Psychologist to motivate and to get out the pressure in any important match.

Regards
Singamsetty Rajesh,
Hello @ 9885228398

[Fiddler]

Rajesh Anna (and this goes out to all the other people who use large bold or capital fonts too),



please use smaller, non-bold fonts because the font type you're using (large and bold) makes it seem that you're shouting. Just FYI.

[BM]

Rajesh Anna (and this goes out to all the other people who use large bold or capital fonts too),

please use smaller, non-bold fonts because the font type you're using (large and bold) makes it seem that you're shouting. Just FYI.

OK I am not shouting, but agreed 100% with Mr. Rajesh.

[Monster]

[quote="Singamsetty Rajesh"][size=18]After losing the VB series by Mamaoth runs, it is judged that Sachin Tendulkar is not a match winner.



This is for all those who say that Sachin doesn't perform in BIG matches (namely, finals). First of all, India invariably gets into those BIG matches because of Sachin's brilliance in the prliminary matches. e.g. the World Cup. If not for him, we wouldn't get into half of those BIG matches, wherein he's not supposed to perform. Think about it. If not for him, we wouldn't be playing many BIG matches in the first place.

[jithendra av]

yeah he is not a match winner at all,he doesnt have the qualities of a match winner like'Zulu' or Gilly.Sachin hardly does any blitzkrieg which is very common in the case of klusener and gilchrist.We all accept that sachin is a great batsman,but the bitter truth is that he does very little when it comes to the grand finale stage.

[BM]

We all accept that sachin is a great batsman,but the bitter truth is that he does very little when it comes to the grand finale stage.

Yes, its true

[Satya]

Firstly...... the very fact that u say since india does't win in the finals sachin is not the best batsman in the world conveys soooo much about the great batsman. U did'nt say laxman is not the best batsman because we dont win finals, nor did u say dravid was responsible nor sehwag nor ganguly.... nor anybody else , even inspite of the fact that he is not the captain and doe'snt do anything else but bat in the team, whereas the above mentioned have a greater role to play. Dravid Also keeps...... Ganguly is the CAPTAIN .... Laxman is in the slips and his drop catches can be held responsible for the drubbing we recived in Calcutta.



U hold Tendulkar responsible for not chasing 360 runs sucessfully..... the very fact that u thought he could do it shows how much u respect the man urself and the fact that u expect miracles from him... Chasing 360 is definetly a miracle. And please remember we are tlaking about the batsman who has 36 one day hundreds. when the batsman with the second highest outside india is Saeed Anwar long retired and then followed by Brian Lara whoose record is 18 Centuires . Sachins Tally is justa simple double of Lara's.



Your Mentioned Zullu has been known for taking South Africa to the finals and falterring in the final moments get ur facts Straight Jack...



If anybodies memory is too weak its ur's buddy if u cant remember 36 hundreds and over 50 50's.



And About Pressure could u think of a match with more pressure than the india pakistan world cup match.... if u can please tell me i would be interested. and if u dont remember wat he did in that match please go to cricket.org and check the records.