Exploitation...is it in the Genes?

by DQ » Fri Oct 28, 2005 5:42 pm

Where did this thread disappear ?

by **CtrlAltDel** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 6:23 pm

what????? is it gone???? :shock:

come to think of it, i never noticed it since 2-3 days ago when hotshorts posted in it....

by **akhilis2cool** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 8:18 pm

it was there today....i guess they deleted it after we spammed it :roll:

by **dareversesting** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 8:36 pm

it was too racist and hence qualified for being deleted...thx mods for the deletion

by **akhilis2cool** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 8:40 pm

dareversesting wrote:it was too racist and hence qualified for being deleted...thx mods for the deletion

that thread was here before u joined the DB...why do u think the mods deleted it now :roll:

by **dareversesting** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 8:49 pm

akhilis2cool wrote:
dareversesting wrote:it was too racist and hence qualified for being deleted...thx mods for the deletion
that thread was here before u joined the DB...why do u think the mods deleted it now

Exactly mate...but does that mean i cant read it :shock:

well better late than never...i think we have went thru all the posts and lol some of them were as pathetic as they cud b....

by **akhilis2cool** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 8:52 pm

dareversesting wrote:
akhilis2cool wrote:
dareversesting wrote:it was too racist and hence qualified for being deleted...thx mods for the deletion
that thread was here before u joined the DB...why do u think the mods deleted it now

Exactly mate...but does that mean i cant read it well better late than never...i think we have went thru all the posts and lol some of them were as pathetic as they cud b....

threads with worse post stilll exist on the DB...look for the 'walled-off' thread....and the 'womens rights' threads..... :roll:

by **dareversesting** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 9:07 pm

akhilis2cool wrote:
dareversesting wrote:
akhilis2cool wrote:
dareversesting wrote:it was too racist and hence qualified for being deleted...thx mods for the deletion
that thread was here before u joined the DB...why do u think the mods deleted it now

Exactly mate...but does that mean i cant read it well better late than never...i think we have went thru all the posts and lol some of them were as pathetic as they cud b....
threads with worse post stilll exist on the DB...look for the 'walled-off' thread....and the 'womens rights' threads.....

lol not anymore bro...i think all the threads which involve racism to a *bit* should be deleted right after being posted....

by **akhilis2cool** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 9:10 pm

dareversesting wrote:
akhilis2cool wrote:
dareversesting wrote:
akhilis2cool wrote:
dareversesting wrote:it was too racist and hence qualified for being deleted...thx mods for the deletion
that thread was here before u joined the DB...why do u think the mods deleted it now

Exactly mate...but does that mean i cant read it well better late than never...i think we have went thru all the posts and lol some of them were as pathetic as they cud b....
threads with worse post stilll exist on the DB...look for the 'walled-off' thread....and the 'womens rights' threads.....

lol not anymore bro...i think all the threads which involve racism to a *bit* should be deleted right after being posted....

well here we've been having discussions like that for a long time... :arrow:

by **dareversesting** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 9:28 pm

hmmm religious discussions shdnt be entertained..wht say ?

by **akhilis2cool** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 9:31 pm

not 'as long as they are within the boundreis of decency'

now please dont ask me to clarify

by **The Jackal** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 9:38 pm

Which thread got deleted?

by **akhilis2cool** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 9:40 pm

a namesake of this one...

by **The Jackal** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 9:45 pm

akhilis2cool wrote:a namesake of this one...

Aacha...that means I havnt read it.

by **dareversesting** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 9:45 pm

akhilis2cool wrote:not 'as long as they are within the boundreis of decency'

now please dont ask me to clarify

exactly if they are within boundries its good and lol y wud i ask you to clarify bro :wink:

this thread had some posts which were way outs limits...well its over thats better..

by **CtrlAltDel** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 11:28 am

yes, but damn...i'd miss picking a fight with DQ....

y'know i am sure DQ and i wud get along very well off the DB, tho we disagree on almost everything on it...

by DQ » Sat Oct 29, 2005 5:25 pm

Bull Shit..........I still dint get a reply to my queries.

by **General Grevious** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 5:32 pm

dareversesting wrote:hmmm religious discussions shdnt be entertained..wht say ?

Could one of the reasons be that you are scared the discussions will shake your faith? In that case you should get off the internet man...lotsa scary shit here.

by **CtrlAltDel** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 12:11 am

DQ wrote:Bull Shit..........I still dint get a reply to my queries.

then put yr query here so that hotshot dude can answer them when he comes here

i am out of this game....getting too dirty for me.

by **dareversesting** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 6:30 am

General Grevious wrote:
dareversesting wrote:hmmm religious discussions shdnt be entertained..wht say ?

Could one of the reasons be that you are scared the discussions will shake your faith? In that case you should get off the internet man...lotsa scary shit here.

dono bout scary but surely BULL shit..i dont even know y ppl take out thier time to discuess thier faiths..well bro do u think to prove our faith in our religions or in anything, we need to prove it ?? and that too on forums?? tht wud b most disgusting thing every......faith is more than enuf...i or u or we or anyone dont need to prove sumthn, if we have faith in ourselves...thats more thn enuf....and last thing in the world someone might b doing out of *loneliless* *desperation* wud b go and prove ur worth...cos hell no we dont need to prove it on sumthn as lame as internet...iam outa this don wana indulge myself

by **CtrlAltDel** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 10:16 am

dareversesting wrote:...do u think to prove our faith in our religions or in anything, we need to prove it ?? ...faith is more than enuf...i or u or we or anyone dont need to prove sumthn, if we have faith in ourselves...thats more thn enuf...

well said dare-something

by DQ » Sun Oct 30, 2005 11:00 am

Aha wat do ya mean dude, exploitation is your faith?

The query is where does this expolitation stem from, it surly is not faith. Where is it then? Simple.....

CAD - "gettin dirty" ahem u dint consider nothin dirty when 1.7 billoin people were termed _? You find it dirty now?

by **fullhyd.com** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 11:06 am

Hi everyone,

The thread was reported to us, and we deleted it since it would've required too much effort to remove just the offensive posts (there were many of them) and then synchronize the rest.

fullhyd.com allows discussions on religion, as long as, ahem, they stay within boundaries of decency

. Posts cannot attack any faiths. We would allow a discussion on, say, women's liberties in Hindusim, but if any posts attack any faith, directly or obliquely, instead of rationally debating, we would need to use discretion to keep the boards healthy and cordial.

We request all the members to kindly report offensive posts to us by email (webmaster at fullhyd dot com) or through a PM. Please mention both the thread and the post. We react fast, usually immediately, when there are specific complaints.

Responding to an offensive post is usually a inefficient use of time, since sooner or later all offensive posts and responses to them will be deleted. Kindly just report offensive posts and flames, even if the temptation to respond is high.

Regards,

fullhyd.com

by DQ » Mon Oct 31, 2005 12:01 pm

Hmm, until I have missed a lot.

I dont seem to have seen anyting offensive in the thread.

Until and unless the moderators them selves took exception to parts of it.

Or maybe they left it going on until CAD bowed out. CAD has still not responded to exerpts of Manusmriti and ah alas the mods preferred to delete the thread.

So much for being a secular board.

by **CtrlAltDel** » Wed Nov 02, 2005 10:19 am

DQ wrote:CAD - "gettin dirty" ahem u dint consider nothin dirty when 1.7 billoin people were termed _? You find it dirty now?

can u plz tell me when i did that? if u cant find such posts, at leats quote me from yr memory...all i had been soing was to discuss why some people of a particular community were narrow minded with regard to other religions and change in itself. if u feel that is an attack on the entire community thats yr perception (maybe its a guilt feeling...

...maybe u feel i am talking about u in person...).

DQ wrote:has still not responded to exerpts of Manusmriti

:? i havent seen that...i think the thread was deleted b4 i cud read it...cud u plz post it again?

btw why are u caugt up with manusmrithi...? :lol:

1) its not a religious text and it doesnt claim to be one

2) its one man's opinion on how a society should function (like a certain other book we know)

3) manusmrithi is not followed by all hindus, most ignore it.

4) the hindus who follow manusmrithi generally follow a watered down version - ie the things that suit today's world...

Exploitation...is it in the Genes?

Exploitation...is it in the Genes?

Who is online