Salman Khan is becoming super hero no. 1

by **sri the democrat** » Sat Sep 28, 2002 6:33 pm

1) Yesterday Salman killed an animal (poaching the blackbuck). 2) Today he killed a man. 3)Tomorrow if he kills a dozen politicians AND dozens of thieves and dacoits in drunken driving or whatever state, he will definitely, permanantly settle in the hearts of not only lonely ladies but also commoners like me

by **anita** » Sun Sep 29, 2002 1:28 am

he is a disgrace to the human race.i think everybody shud boycott his movies and shud be abandoned by the bollywood.he killed those homeless sleeping on the footpath.he has also killed endangered species.why is he still not behind the bars????can somebody tell me why is he being accepted by the people as a hero?what is the police doing??

by **Revolutionist Indian** » Sun Sep 29, 2002 12:09 pm

Ha Ha Ha # Ha Ha Ha ###$$$ POLICE , LOL , ROFL Police Wav Anita what a joke ., Police do you still think we have Something called police or law in India. If there is then plz. lemme know I am eager to see Some , sorry Few ... sorry atleast one Policeman who is good , responsible , punctual, decidicated to his duty and not sticked with the label called curruption. \'HEY POOR INDIANS WE DONT HAVE ORDERS TO PROTECT YOU FROM EVILS\'..Slogan of Police.. Ha Ha Ha Ha..Police...Therz no Wonder one day you will find these careatures sitting in red light area selling themselves along with CSW. Hire one CSW get 5 P free.

by **Shaad-Aabaad** » Sun Sep 29, 2002 2:03 pm

Well said. In India, you can get around the law easily if you are a politician (George Fernandes/Narasimha Rao/L K Advani, Jayalalitha...) or a film star (Sunjay Dutt, Puru Raj Kumar, Salman Khan, Fardeen Khan....). The law is only for the law abiding, the rest have a free hand... This is not America where even the country\'s president can be put on trial or impeached... Like they say, it happens only in India...!!
As for Salman Khan, the lesser said the better. He is fast becoming a pest. It\'s high time someone put an end to his crazy, attention-seeking, hazardous antics...

by **sri the democrat** » Sun Sep 29, 2002 2:47 pm

Hi Shaheed, don\'t talk about clinton. Because I strongly condemn the American society which enjoys free sex and behaviour but expects its president to be pure. Strange isn\'t it?. I am the democrat. Our old president Mr Clinton is also a democrat.

by **Shaad-Aabaad** » Sun Sep 29, 2002 2:58 pm

First thing I am not Shahed; read the name at the bottom. Secondly, you\'re probably right about the double standards of the American society. But let\'s not take the topic off the track shall we? :-)

by **anita** » Sun Sep 29, 2002 7:48 pm

yeah, if only the police did a job of police, things wud not have been so bad for us.Atleast the bollywood has to take some action on this attrocious deeds of salman khan.May be if people boycot his movies , he will atleast realise what he has done.

by **luicifer-in-disguise** » Mon Sep 30, 2002 11:55 am

what the hell... i dont understand how the ppl are using this word \"disgrace\"... so fluently w/o ne grace... these ppl can never even imagine what it takes to be a actor, forget actor, a super star??????? at the same time these pretty well know as to how many tensions and threats he should deal in his every day life, from the underworld, personal life, and that B****... OK, c\'mon accidents do happen, he did not intentionally kill some body, n regarding the animal he killed , who is not curios about the rare animals flesh...???

by **sri** » Mon Sep 30, 2002 2:42 pm

hey luci somebody told me that he is still unmarried.may be his uncontrollable mental pressures are because of that????

by **anita** » Tue Oct 01, 2002 1:51 am

Mr lucifier , evarybody will have their own tensions. neer forget that.everybody will have threats in some or other aspects of their life.that doesnt mean that you go on killing humans and naimals, right ?? i never expoected you to defenb such a person in the first place.

by **luicifer-in-disguise** » Tue Oct 01, 2002 8:41 am

hey anita... firstly he did not kill any person, that was a accident, n dont forget, \'bt the many accidents, that occur on Indian roads every day... Now that Salman is involved in one \"\"\"accident\"\"\"\", we don\'t mix up our personal things.

by **neeraj** » Tue Oct 01, 2002 4:36 pm

anita hi, when you saw salman you came alive is it?/ never seen you in other boards yaar????

by **Sri** » Tue Jul 19, 2005 8:33 pm

Why this Rascal Salman Khan is still being allowed to roam around freely in society.

What was the real story in Aiswarya matter?

by **Ar!e$** » Tue Jul 19, 2005 9:41 pm

Sri wrote:Why this Rascal Salman Khan is still being allowed to roam around freely in society.
What was the real story in Aiswarya matter?

why shud we bother whts his story or hers infact..its their lives...

by **lonewolf** » Tue Jul 19, 2005 9:56 pm

Ar!e$ wrote:
Sri wrote:Why this Rascal Salman Khan is still being allowed to roam around freely in society.
What was the real story in Aiswarya matter?

why shud we bother whts his story or hers infact..its their lives...

Sri was probably referring to the threat Salman made to her regarding involving the underworld terrorists. Thats why it doesn't involve just the two of them, but people who are a danger to our national security too.

by fl » Tue Jul 19, 2005 9:57 pm

Ar!e$ wrote:
Sri wrote:Why this Rascal Salman Khan is still being allowed to roam around freely in society.
What was the real story in Aiswarya matter?

why shud we bother whts his story or hers infact..its their lives...

by **lonewolf** » Tue Jul 19, 2005 10:06 pm

fl wrote:<html>
<a href=http://in.rediff.com/movies/2005/jul/19shukla.htm> read this </a>
</html>

Use BBCode

Well, you have to start at some point. If a hundred people jump the traffic signal and the cop catches only 4 or 5 for whatever reason, those who he caught are still at fault. They need to be punished accordingly. You can't let them go free just because the cop couldn't catch the other 94+ people who jumped the signal.

by fl » Tue Jul 19, 2005 10:24 pm

lonewolf wrote:
fl wrote:

Use BBCode

Well, you have to start at some point. If a hundred people jump the traffic signal and the cop catches only 4 or 5 for whatever reason, those who he caught are still at fault. They need to be punished accordingly. You can't let them go free just because the cop couldn't catch the other 94+ people who jumped the signal.

i dont think mumbai police is so stupid that they wud let him go if it was for real

i am sure they recorded most of his conversations in that period of time

and if he did have links he wud have talked to them on the phone some day and the police sud have had some evidence

and that tape would have comeout instead of this

btw i donno how many know

this was the cover story of the launch edition of HT in mumbai

by **CtrlAltDel** » Wed Jul 20, 2005 8:13 am

guys, we need to remember that its not yet proved that its salman's voice. it could well be a dirty hoax.

the onus to prove his guilt is on the law and media. salman need not prove he is innocent even before a trial takes place.

as for stopping the screening of his movie, its unwarranted and a publicity gimmick for the political parties. moreover, the loss from stopping the movie wud not be salman's but the producer, distributors, exhibitors and a hundred others.

as long as salman is not proved guilty, we cant judge him like this.

by **lizard king** » Wed Jul 20, 2005 8:17 am

Just like most others, this salman Khan has a psychiatric problem that needs to be adressed man. i reckon they should rather put him in an asylum than in a prison. And i dont think he is faking it, like our Balayya did a few months ago.

by **Mayavi Morpheus** » Wed Jul 20, 2005 9:05 am

CtrlAltDel wrote:as long as salman is not proved guilty, we cant judge him like this.

Salman khan has been under mumbai police watch ever since he attended abu salems party in dubai after which gulshan kumar was killed. Rumour is that he and some other film stars were aware of the plot (and salman esp., knew about mumbai bomb blasts too) to kill gulshan kumar.

by **akhilis2cool** » Wed Jul 20, 2005 10:25 am

Well, salman khan has got away with most of the cases filed against him.

This one seems to be going the same way.

by **CtrlAltDel** » Wed Jul 20, 2005 10:45 am

Mayavi Morpheus wrote:Salman khan has been under mumbai police watch ever since he attended abu salems party in dubai after which gulshan kumar was killed.

yes...and most of the bollywood actors used to attend the parties thrown by various dons. like everyone else all such thing start with coercion.

Mayavi Morpheus wrote:Rumour is that he and some other film stars were aware of the plot (and salman esp., knew about mumbai bomb blasts too) to kill gulshan kumar.

Rumour alrite...we cannot make decisions and judgements based on rumours.

i am not absolving Sallu of guilt, but keeping an open mind abt the fact that it might be possible he is not as guilty as its being portrayed.

by **Betty** » Wed Jul 20, 2005 10:56 am

I personally cannot condone salman for killing the homeless person sleeping on the footpath.

However, in this case, things are different.

The police cannot provide enough protection to anyone, not even filmstars. So, when a filmstar gets an extortion threat, he/she usually pays up to save his skin. If these threats and payments are repeated, obviously there will be interactions and if these gangsters throw parties and invite filmstars, they are supposed to attend them.

So, arresting a person just because he had been talking to a gangster or seen in a party thrown by some gangster, is weird. If the police had so much info, why can't they just arrest the gangster instead of its 'friends'?

And yeah, I agree with CAD on his views about stopping screening his movies. A movie runs because the audience wants it to run, and to stop it from running by protesting,etc. or state interference is against democracy and nothing but a political gimmick.

by **Mayavi Morpheus** » Wed Jul 20, 2005 12:08 pm

CtrlAltDel wrote:yes...and most of the bollywood actors used to attend the parties thrown by various dons. like everyone else all such thing start with coercion.

Yes, some actors are coerced into attending those parties (Salman khan was precisely trying that on Ash if the tapes are to be believed), and then there are some who voluntarily attend them owing to their bonhomie with the underworld. Salman falls into the later category and he was under watch along with a bunch of other individuals who attended that particular party and it is for this reason that his line was being tapped.

CtrlAltDel wrote:Rumour alrite...we cannot make decisions and judgements based on rumours.

i am not absolving Sallu of guilt, but keeping an open mind abt the fact that it might be possible he is not as guilty as its being portrayed.

Salman khan with Dawoods brother

So, arresting a person just because he had been talking to a gangster or seen in a party thrown by some gangster, is weird. If the police had so much info, why can't they just arrest the gangster instead of its 'friends'?

Betty ji, neither the police nor the gangsters are as stupid as we think they are. The gangsters operate from dubai and hongkong because they know they would be arrested if they set their foot in India. Indian police and intelligence agencies cannot do anything but keep tabs on them and one way of doing it is by keeping their hench men in India under survelliance. Dawoods daughter is getting married to Miandads son in Karachi, pakistan. Many Indian gangsters and businessmen are going to attend. Dawood is on the international terrorrist list and the Indian intelligence setup knows where the wedding is and who all from India are attending, but they cant do anything about it but spy on the guests. For, visiting pakistan to attend a wedding is not a crime in India.

Who is online