by akhilis2cool » Sun May 22, 2005 10:02 am
3 T'z wrote:CtrlAltDel wrote:akhilis2cool wrote:Sri wrote:of course he is required
as a Permanent member
well, yes
i disagree....there shud be no concept of Job Security in the Indian cricket team....this is no effing govt. job.
underperformers have to be chucked out...whether its sachin or laxman or balaji.
if Chappel is able to bring this kinda australian mentality in BCCI and the team (forget the immature public for now), he deserves a Bharat Ratna.
xactly...theres no point in keep da outta form players in the team n just waiting for them to make a good comebk even if it means handin over the matches n series 2 the opponent team,itz surely more sensible to give the new players a chance to perform n prove emselvz...n tht way we can have good new players 2 fall bk on durin hard times..
hain?
who are we talking about here, sachin in particular...or neplayer in general?
AFAIK sachin is nething BUT an underperformer. Theres nothing wrong in cracking the whip on the players who make it to the teams only because of the Quota System. But in the last few years such cases have been very few. Greg Chapples job has been made easy by John Wright. The BCCI...the selection commettee and the concerned ppl. are very diff. from what they were when Wright was appointed. Its fair to say that they more concerned with the
Teams performance than meeting the regional quotas.
The team needs the senior players as they can guide the younger ones thru...having said that the underperformers will have to stay out.
People are crazy, at times are strange. I am locked-in tight, I am out of range.
I used to care, but things have changed.