The Apollo Hoax

[mark]

You mean the shadows are going in different dirrections?

i think he means the pussy cat in the background.

[ycr007]

I Did'nt Realise that THAT was a Pussy cat Until U pointed it out Mark....



Mebbe it was a Mooncatter???

[mark]

haha, i think thats the joke. everybodys going "oh yeah dude, the shadows are going different directions, wow!" and everyone overlooks the mooncat.

[ycr007]

Yeah....Since the photo's in B&W and the Shadows are the Most-Talked

about things in these kinda photoes,practically everyone overlooks the cat.

also at first glance it seems a lot like jus' a rock and even then ppl stare

at its shadow and not itself,so pretty easy to miss it.......

[CtrlAltDel]

pussy cat? that animal reminded me of a miniature, pocket sized lion



a moon-lion perhaps?

[akhilis2cool]

If NASA wanted to create a Hoax u can expect them to b intelligent enuf make sure that they want take such pics.

wonder where the author got that pic from.

[The Jackal]

If NASA wanted to create a Hoax u can expect them to b intelligent enuf make sure that they want take such pics.
wonder where the author got that pic from.

That must have been faked.I didnt see that pic on anyone of the original websites.

[akhilis2cool]

If NASA wanted to create a Hoax u can expect them to b intelligent enuf make sure that they want take such pics.
wonder where the author got that pic from.

That must have been faked.I didnt see that pic on anyone of the original websites.

thats a pic form one of the links given by ycr.

can u post the pics u've seen?

or are they in the link u've given..?

i'll chekit out.

[The Jackal]

Yep I am talking about the pics in the links I gave.

[akhilis2cool]

Yep I am talking about the pics in the links I gave.

The pics in ur links made more sense actually.what does NASA has to say abt.?

I once read in a magazine the replys given by NASA. they were pretty convining too.

[The Jackal]

Yep I am talking about the pics in the links I gave.

The pics in ur links made more sense actually.what does NASA has to say abt.?
I once read in a magazine the replys given by NASA. they were pretty convining too.

They gave a couple of explanations but just some of it made any sense.Like for the flag they said that they was a wire in it so that it will look like its flying.Thats acceptable.They said something about the shadows too.They said that sun ISNT the only source of light in the universe and hence mutliple shadows.....but how come they are that distinct.And they didnt touch on the subject of similar mountains.....or maybe I have missed that part.

[akhilis2cool]

Yep I am talking about the pics in the links I gave.

The pics in ur links made more sense actually.what does NASA has to say abt.?
I once read in a magazine the replys given by NASA. they were pretty convining too.

They gave a couple of explanations but just some of it made any sense.Like for the flag they said that they was a wire in it so that it will look like its flying.Thats acceptable.They said something about the shadows too.They said that sun ISNT the only source of light in the universe and hence mutliple shadows.....but how come they are that distinct.And they didnt touch on the subject of similar mountains.....or maybe I have missed that part.

I wonder why they arent coming forward to answer these queries...is it coz theres something really fishy or becoz they arent too interested to waste time.

[The Jackal]

Yep I am talking about the pics in the links I gave.

The pics in ur links made more sense actually.what does NASA has to say abt.?
I once read in a magazine the replys given by NASA. they were pretty convining too.

They gave a couple of explanations but just some of it made any sense.Like for the flag they said that they was a wire in it so that it will look like its flying.Thats acceptable.They said something about the shadows too.They said that sun ISNT the only source of light in the universe and hence mutliple shadows.....but how come they are that distinct.And they didnt touch on the subject of similar mountains.....or maybe I have missed that part.

I wonder why they arent coming forward to answer these queries...is it coz theres something really fishy or becoz they arent too interested to waste time.

Could be anything man.We have to wait till 2010 for that.

[akhilis2cool]

Yep I am talking about the pics in the links I gave.

The pics in ur links made more sense actually.what does NASA has to say abt.?
I once read in a magazine the replys given by NASA. they were pretty convining too.

They gave a couple of explanations but just some of it made any sense.Like for the flag they said that they was a wire in it so that it will look like its flying.Thats acceptable.They said something about the shadows too.They said that sun ISNT the only source of light in the universe and hence mutliple shadows.....but how come they are that distinct.And they didnt touch on the subject of similar mountains.....or maybe I have missed that part.

I wonder why they arent coming forward to answer these queries...is it coz theres something really fishy or becoz they arent too interested to waste time.

Could be anything man.We have to wait till 2010 for that.

Woh kisliye? kuch hone wala hai kya.or are we going to the moon that year

[The Jackal]

Yep I am talking about the pics in the links I gave.

The pics in ur links made more sense actually.what does NASA has to say abt.?
I once read in a magazine the replys given by NASA. they were pretty convining too.

They gave a couple of explanations but just some of it made any sense.Like for the flag they said that they was a wire in it so that it will look like its flying.Thats acceptable.They said something about the shadows too.They said that sun ISNT the only source of light in the universe and hence mutliple shadows.....but how come they are that distinct.And they didnt touch on the subject of similar mountains.....or maybe I have missed that part.

I wonder why they arent coming forward to answer these queries...is it coz theres something really fishy or becoz they arent too interested to waste time.

Could be anything man.We have to wait till 2010 for that.

Woh kisliye? kuch hone wala hai kya.or are we going to the moon that year

In the 1960's President John F. Kenndy gave a statement that America will go to the moon by the end of that decade.....way way before the preparations for the moon landing.

Last year President George W. Bush gave a statement that America will go to moon first again....place a base there and then land on Mars.

The major controversied about this was the statement given by JFK because no one had even thought about the moon and BHAM one day America went to moon....it was said that the moon landing was faked to keep up the reputation of America otherwise the world would laugh at them.

Now if the Mars landing was made possible byt the end of this decade exactly the way President Bush said it would happen...then it will most probably be a fake too.

[akhilis2cool]

Yep I am talking about the pics in the links I gave.

The pics in ur links made more sense actually.what does NASA has to say abt.?
I once read in a magazine the replys given by NASA. they were pretty convining too.

They gave a couple of explanations but just some of it made any sense.Like for the flag they said that they was a wire in it so that it will look like its flying.Thats acceptable.They said something about the shadows too.They said that sun ISNT the only source of light in the universe and hence mutliple shadows.....but how come they are that distinct.And they didnt touch on the subject of similar mountains.....or maybe I have missed that part.

I wonder why they arent coming forward to answer these queries...is it coz theres something really fishy or becoz they arent too interested to waste time.

Could be anything man.We have to wait till 2010 for that.

Woh kisliye? kuch hone wala hai kya.or are we going to the moon that year

In the 1960's President John F. Kenndy gave a statement that America will go to the moon by the end of that decade.....way way before the preparations for the moon landing.
Last year President George W. Bush gave a statement that America will go to moon first again....place a base there and then land on Mars.
The major controversied about this was the statement given by JFK because no one had even thought about the moon and BHAM one day America went to moon....it was said that the moon landing was faked to keep up the reputation of America otherwise the world would laugh at them.
Now if the Mars landing was made possible byt the end of this decade exactly the way President Bush said it would happen...then it will most probably be a fake too.

wow!

they sure will of to work there ass off to create such a hoax.

[The Jackal]

Yep I am talking about the pics in the links I gave.

The pics in ur links made more sense actually.what does NASA has to say abt.?
I once read in a magazine the replys given by NASA. they were pretty convining too.

They gave a couple of explanations but just some of it made any sense.Like for the flag they said that they was a wire in it so that it will look like its flying.Thats acceptable.They said something about the shadows too.They said that sun ISNT the only source of light in the universe and hence mutliple shadows.....but how come they are that distinct.And they didnt touch on the subject of similar mountains.....or maybe I have missed that part.

I wonder why they arent coming forward to answer these queries...is it coz theres something really fishy or becoz they arent too interested to waste time.

Could be anything man.We have to wait till 2010 for that.

Woh kisliye? kuch hone wala hai kya.or are we going to the moon that year

In the 1960's President John F. Kenndy gave a statement that America will go to the moon by the end of that decade.....way way before the preparations for the moon landing.
Last year President George W. Bush gave a statement that America will go to moon first again....place a base there and then land on Mars.
The major controversied about this was the statement given by JFK because no one had even thought about the moon and BHAM one day America went to moon....it was said that the moon landing was faked to keep up the reputation of America otherwise the world would laugh at them.
Now if the Mars landing was made possible byt the end of this decade exactly the way President Bush said it would happen...then it will most probably be a fake too.

wow!
they sure will of to work there ass off to create such a hoax.

Yeah thats what I think.BTW too many typo's in that post.Hope you could understand.

[ycr007]

Interesying......First a Moon Hoax and Now a Mars Hoax to boot......



but Since the Cassini Huygens Made it to mars,I think there wud be

many pics and the hoax this time can be Smoothly made......