vivek wrote:However, the humor edge gotta go to Dilbert, they are silly and makes you smile. Calvin is mostly stupid and falls flat (flatter than that of Dilberts).
I just HAD to reply to that, and it's taking tremendous effort not to say anything nasty

Anyway, I appreciate both comic strips because I can relate to both on some level, but I've been into Calvin and Hobbes WAY too long to allow anything else to come close. What I like about the humour in CnH is that it can be very self-deprecatory at times and is almost always on two levels: the blatantly obvious, slapstick humour usually hides the more subtle, human angle of the strip in question and it's usually this angle that is the point, rather than the slapstick.
Dilbert, on the other hand, very rarely has this quality, the humour usually being very obvious. It's probably easier for someone in the corporate world to appreciate Dilbert but, being in the corporate world myself, I must say that I'd still go for Calvin and Hobbes because of the subtle humour and (paraphrasing Kishore) great illustration. I think the expressions on Clavin's face are PRICELESS when Susie exacts retribution!!

)