ZC wrote:good points PMoW, particularly i agree on...... it just happens that people with good analytical abilities enter engineering...............would u like to comment on This is the reason that you rarely find an MBA entrepreneur. Someone else always has to create an organisation, which the MBA is then happy to manage. IIMs are not about creating entrepreneurs, individuals with a passion for ideas, for risk taking. every event on start-ups i attended and everyone i have heard to, say......."its all done by techies".............its a general european belief that if u have IT in u, u will do it, therez no need for an MBA, u learn everything on job, agreed to a certain extent, now-a-days, even they are saying, probably an engineer needs to go to b-school after working for a few yrs!!! coming to disagreement.......... i dont agree with ur point, people r there in mfd'ing coz they have no where else to go...........probably true in India, but upto an extent. thats sounds something like, u r in mfd'ing means u didnt get another better job, which falls in the same line as, u r not in India coz u r not capable to go to US !! is it? we just cant generalize ............isint it ? IIM guys are self centric, i would like to ask the writer of the first article, ofcourse .....r u not? r u not interested in making money? no fundaas please ..........as long as there is population (intellectual) explosion in only one or two sectors...............the country is destined to go to the dogs !!and finally, most of IIM student dont have any experience, thats the worst part of the top notch b-schools. they are basically helping people to change lines/careers, but are not training best people in all industries(thats seems like business being done by the institute itself rather than doing service to the society) ........
yr points r also valid ZC. i'd like to point out here that even i dont agree with most points in that article.
but one question remains: engineering education is highly subsidised in India, whether OU or RECs or IITs. Since most of the engineering grads from any branch gravitate towards management or computer programming...to earn good money...whats the point in subsidising their education...?
as India is a democracy and as v have a right of choice, the govt. cannot compel the engineer to stick to his own field but should remove subsidies since theres no point in it.
this craze for marketing and IT will lead to depleted resources in other vital branches of the economy and that will affect the country in the long run. we already saw how after the DOT COM bust, thousands of engineers were jobless, mainly coz they were prepared only to work in IT. if many had preferred their line of specialization, they wudn't ve faced this problem.
on similar lines i also do not support the govt. move to cut IIM fees, since the students get astronomical pay-packets after graduation anyway. all banks fall over each other to lend to IIM students, so there's no financial burden on the student.



