Moderator: The Moderator Team






misuse_dowry_laws wrote:Hello DQ,
Before challenging others, get facts straight. There is already a bill in RAJYA SABHA on Amendment of Laws. See page 14 point(3).
Visit:
rajyasabha.nic.in/legislative/ amendbills/home/LX_2003.pdf
In Rajya Sabha
3. Section 498-A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 provides punishment to husband or relatives of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty. It has been widely reported that this provision has been misused and is also harsh as it is non-compoundable. It is, therefore, proposed to make the offence a compoundable one.
Can you please let us know what exactly you mean by more stringent laws (so far as dowry act is concerned) ? I doubt if you know the present laws in the first place.
Please let us also know, if it is proved (BEYOND DOUBT) that the woman filed a false case, then what punishment the woman should get.

DQ wrote: OH REALLY, The true scenario, Return ticket paid by the Brides side. $20000 to $100000 paid as dowry. Gifts and wedding ceremony and hosting of Grooms freinds in 5 star hotels.
After all this
1. Girl is too conservative, I cant take her to the US. Look for another girl.
2. Girl will not go to the US and insist on leading an independant life. I will lock her in my apartment and use her as a showpiece, she should not mingle, she should not visit distant or near relative (life is busy there) etc etc etc.
3. If visa is rejected, I will not come back. I will come back to remarry. I will not settle in India for the girls sake.
And you expect the Indian govt to turn a blind eye to this and heed an unresearched advisory MMMPH
Saale char din kya India se bahar nikle Akad dekhe
DQ wrote:Exactly if the guy thinks that its a pay per visit, then he should realise kitna mehnga shauk karra
DQ wrote:Settled right, and if found guilty, what action is the US govt taking. Why dont they cancel VISAs of such cool dudes.

misuse_dowry_laws wrote:Hello DQ,
I appreciate your great sense of logic. I really appreciate your response to my Question "What punishment do you recomment if it is proven BEYOND DOUBT that the Woman has filed a false case ?"
DQ Responded:
WETHER ITS A WRONG OR RIGHT CASE THE MAN SHOULD BE PUNISHED. UNTIL DOWRY AT VICES RELATED TO IT ARE ERADICATED IF A FEW MEN SUFFER SO BE IT.
This is nothing but FASCISM (where deeds of a very small section of people is blamed on an entire gender). Certainly, you must join some very powerful FEMINAZIES (Militant Feminists, who think if they bash and victimise innocent men at random, then females will have better life).
Read this newpaper article, where the Boy's parents commit Suicide due to False dowry case by the Woman. Now, the woman and her father are booked. So, you must admit that my research is far from being sloppy. You have already termed US State Department as Sloppy. So Now, you do not say that the Judge in this particular case is sloppy.
http://www.hindu.com/2004/02/15/stories ... 500600.htm
Spare innocent in-laws, judge tells probe authorities
By A. Subramani
CHENNAI, FEB.14. The Madras High Court has cautioned investigating authorities against arraying ``innocent in-laws'' as accused in dowry cases.
``Only when the authorities are fully satisfied that the in-laws are really involved in harassment, shall they be implicated as accused,'' said Justice A.K. Rajan.
He was dismissing an anticipatory bail plea by one Sangeetha, her father and two brothers, who moved the court as her parents-in-law committed suicide leaving behind a note stating they were unable to bear her harassment allegations.
Ms. Sangeetha lodged a complaint against her husband, T. Vignesh, and his parents, in the Sooramangalam police station (Salem), alleging that she was being harassed for dowry.
After getting a stay on the operation of the first information report, Mr. Vignesh preferred a complaint against his wife and in-laws. All of them obtained anticipatory bail.
Meanwhile, his parents committed suicide.
In their suicide note they said they were taking the extreme step ``due to the false complaint of dowry demand.''
Following a petition from Mr. Vignesh, the High Court directed the police to alter the case into Section 306 IPC.
The anticipatory bail was preferred by Ms. Sangeetha, her father Balakrishnan, and brothers, Iyyappan and Selvaraj following the alteration of charges.
Suicide note as dying declaration
Mr. Justice Rajan, holding that the conduct of Ms. Sangeetha and others was ``proximate to the death of the parents of Mr. Vignesh,'' said, ``prima facie, the suicide note left behind by the parents of Mr. Vignesh, can be treated as a dying declaration.
It appears that they committed suicide only due to the allegation made against them by Ms. Sangeetha that they demanded dowry.

Return to The Hyderabadi Planet!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
{{todos[0].text}}