by Saradhi » Tue Dec 30, 2003 12:39 pm
I have a few questions to put after going thru that INterview.
1)He says "If TRS manages to get all the Lok Sabha seats in Telangana region, we can exert pressure to get the separate Telangana State. The powers at the centre have no other option, but to accept it. The creation of a separate Telangana State is possible only through legislation in the Parliament. It should be a political decision alone. Hence my initial strategy and argument holds good till date."
He is absolutely right. Then why he & his party is trying to contest in next AP Assembly elections. He can wait & make the party more strong & can contest in next coming Parliament elections and can send may be 7 to 10 MPs from his region to parliament And can pressurise next Govt for the Telangana. May be who knows if TDP fails miserably in next AP Assembly elections, BJP may go away from TDP & may go in alliance with TRS & KCR can join NDA & can get his seperate State. Its sure that only Parliamennt resolution can give seperate Telagna state. We all know in its miserable position and the reluctance of Congress not realising the politics of coaliatons , Congress cant come to power in Centre for the next 10 years. Why cant KCR realise this fact & become closer to TDP-BJP Alliance by joining NDA & I am sure TDP is ready to sacrifice 10 MPs for its existence in AP state politics.
2) He again says "Whether it is the BJP or the Congress, they have cheated the people in the Telangana region. They have no commitment at all. All that they can do it is to keep the Telangana issue on the agenda besides several other issues. In Telangana we don’t want Dr Y S Rajashekar Reddy’s padayatras or Nara Chandrababu Naidu’s whirlwind tours. ".
Then why all this fuss about having an alliance with Congress?? Once he says Congress is the number one enemy for Telangana. and again he says we are ready for any alliance with any party to defeat TDP-BJP. Wts this all about?? Are these double standards or is there any confusion in his mind??
3) He says "The Naxal issue is a socio-economic and political issue. If the center can have a dialogue with Mizo rebels, Naga rebels and if Srilanaka government opens a dialogue with the LTTE why not with the naxals here? What is the problem? Even the battle of Kurukshetra had its ending. Is it difficult to find a solution to naxal problem? ".
He is partially right. But if govt was ready to come for discussions, what the Naxals did?? They never came for discussions. What happeded when NTR lifted ban over naxals and asked them to come into active life?? They exploited the situation & recruited more & more people openly.
socio-economic and political issue is not all about destroying People's assets, govt buildings & railway stations.
There was a NEWS that Naxals planned to attack Thitupathi temple like in Aksharadhamamu. IF ISI people attacked Akshradhaamamu, it is meaningful, they are not from India & tried to destroy India, but where are these naxalites?? from where these people came??Are they are not human beings??
What they will gain if they destroys People's assets, railway stations, public places, govt offices???