by Anil » Thu Sep 25, 2003 9:14 am
Neeraja, there are two things I thought I needed to clarify. Firstly, I see everyone on these boards as being of the neutral gender (pun intended) – it’s immaterial, at least for me, whether they are girls or guys. To me, we all are faceless individuals. It’s only through what we post that we get some idea (could be totally wrong also) as to what sort of person he/she is. For instance, reading your postings, I view you as someone who doesn\'t like one bit the way today\'s youngsters behave or their life style (but believe me, it isn’t that bad and you ought to give us a second chance). You tend to be over-protective and cautious in whatever you do and, also about your surroundings. So, if you have kids, I must say they are lucky to have in you a very caring mom. Again, I might be totally wrong, too. And no, I am not into any Jyothishya Shastra.
<br>
<br>
Secondly, why Pavani? Well, if you had seen her (or his) last posting (which was removed by the moderator), then you would have realised why I took the liberties to assuage Pavani\'s feelings. If there was even an iota of truth in what Pavani said, then I was just attempting to offer some solace. On the contrary, if all that was made up, then well, we should be very fortunate to be still a part of a sane society and very lucky to consider ourselves as the most evolved creature on the planet! For heaven\'s sake, child-abuse is really a serious issue. You don\'t accuse someone of child abuse nonchalantly and then go ahead as though nothing happened! You don’t invoke it to get an upper hand in an argument! Gosh! How low have we to stoop to do that?
<br>
<br>
There is something else I wanted to share, in general. And Neeraja, this has nothing to do with you. Purely personal observations - not pleasurable though. Looking at the postings, I presume these are mostly from the cream of the society. It seems like we have perfected the art of intolerance and derisiveness. Seemingly innocuous topics like food and food habits - also evoke such strong passions that if given a chance we won\'t flinch to wring each other\'s throats to prove that we are right. We are fighting over fragmenting states, excavating long-forgotten issues (return Chennai – excuse me, but what is that?). Isn’t it enough that we fight in the name of religion, language and natural resources? Why do we have to expand the list? We already have handfuls to keep us busy for the next thousand years!
<br>
<br>
And making mockery of almost everything, all in the name of humour, seems to be the national pastime. Is that cool or pathetic or just plain insolence? For instance, an anguished parent\'s enquiry about schools is answered by an advice to admit the kids in schools which accentuate on religion. Why? Extending this barrage further, the parent is also advised to exorcise the \"western influence\" to start with, by a forceful change of attire. Its amusing but western influence (believe me, it’s not that evil) is not some ghost to be exorcised - even if it is, mere change of dress will not produce any results. BTW, don\'t all Indian schools have uniforms? So, where does the question of wearing jeans (or the western outfits) to schools arise? What’s with the these analogies – to make women safe in the society, everyone needs to have a live-in girlfriend, breakup and lo! Attain salvation and turn into a sage! What if something went awry in this neo-buddhistic metamorphosis and instead of becoming an enlightened one you end up as a maniac wanting more or more dangerously as a psychopath? Very difficult to digest!