akhilis2cool wrote:solosynergy wrote:akhilis2cool wrote:solosynergy wrote:akhilis2cool wrote:its not that bad. i think bush is better than kerry.
u have to watch fahrenheit 9/11 and read the book "dude wheres my country". check out
http://www.michaelmoore.com too
kerry would not do nething different from what bush is doing. bush has done a OK job of it so far.
what moore's website is showing happens every where (fake votes). he is not directly supporting kerry.
thats not the only thing i am talkin about. do u know about his links with the Osama family.about his reaction as the planes crashed into the twin towers. about the 13 members of the bin laden family who were flown out of the US on the special authorisation of the president. this is just the tip of the Ice berg.
nope kindly elaborate
LINKS BETWEEN BUSH AND LADEN FAMILY http://emperors-clothes.com/news/bushladen.htmWhile thousands of human beings lie buried under tons of rubble in devastated Manhattan, the U.S. and Britain have launched a massive bombing attack on Afghanistan. Among the declared targets: electrical power facilities (1), clearly an attack on civilians. Hundreds of thousands of terrorized human beings are fleeing into the cold countryside, carrying with them nothing but their poverty. Among the weapons employed by Infinite Justice: Tomahawk missiles, which are partly composed of deadly Depleted Uranium. U.S. and British soldiers and Afghan civilians take note: Afghan Syndrome may be just around the corner. (2)
But some folks are doing OK.
Below we have reprinted an article from the 'Wall Street Journal'. It reveals that Saudi Binladin Group, the conglomerate owned by Osama bin Laden's family, has invested in:
"Carlyle Group, a well-connected Washington merchant bank specializing in buyouts of defense and aerospace companies." ('WSJ,' 27 September 2001)
Through his lofty position at Carlyle and as a consultant, George Bush Sr. is closely linked to the bin Ladens. As are other powerhouse U.S. politicians.
Given that Carlyle's business is "defense," the Bushes and bin Ladens may well profit handsomely from the current war.
There has been no outcry in the mass media about this. No U.S. newspaper has picked up the WSJ story. Nor has CNN or Fox.
As for politicians, only those involved have commented, and they dismissed the bin Laden link without a blush. For instance, Caspar Weinberger, Reagan's Secretary of Defense and part of the Saudi Binladin connection says:
"I don't think the sins of the son should be visited on the father or the brother and the cousins and the aunts." ('WSJ,' 27 September 2001)
How stern Weinberger was when it came to invading little Grenada; how non-judgmental when his own interests are at stake.
At first, Bush spokeswoman Jean Becker told the 'Wall Street Journal' that her boss had met with the bin Ladens only once.
But "after being read the ex-president's subsequent thank-you note" the original "only once" claim was revised. In other words, she got caught in a lie and switched to a new story:
"President Bush does not have a relationship with the bin Laden family," says Ms. Becker. "He's met them twice." ('WSJ,' 27 September 2001)
Once, twice, who's counting?
Clearly a) Bush has a guilty conscience, otherwise why not tell the truth? And b) since he's clearly in stonewall-mode there is no reason to believe there weren't more meetings with the bin Ladens. How many more? Who knows? But his spokeswoman's behavior shows this: if Bush did have more meetings, he surely won't come clean unless confronted with proof.
WHAT??? Are people dumb and blind here? I am so shocked, so mad. So what Kerry wasnt the best opponent running, he was lesser of the two evils.
