by lucifer_in_disguise » Fri Jun 21, 2002 12:30 am
Hyderabadi, my answer to ur points
>1. they should be atleast graduates....\" how many graduates in India atleast know completely as to what subjects they have studied to attain there graduation....huh\"\"
> 2.should have diploma in political sciences through recognised school or college......
\"can you please give us the names of the most recognaized college for political science in India\"???
3.no criminal background.
\" Unfortunately in India there are a lot of criminals....i mean ppl with criminal attitude...\"
>>>secondly for those who aspiring for the post of finance ministry, external affair should have much higher qualification compare to rest.<<<<
A foreign minister or finance minister need not attain a economics PG from stanford....he has a lot of PA\'s who are highly competent, he should just encourage rt ideas given to him...\"\"
>>>>secondly even we should have age limitations. most of our senior leaders including pm and president are too old. they can\'t even walk steadly. so one should be below 58 and above 35 that makes good sense, they are going to be active and lively. not like former sleeping,sliperring PMs and Presidents.<<<<<
One should be a PM @ 35.....are u crazy, what sort of parliamentary exp does he have at that age, n do u think a nanive guy should represent our nation....grow up boy!!!!
>>>suggest ur views.<<<<
I can just say one needs to have a broader perception and knowledge to talk about these things.....