Sunday, 8 February 2026 »  Login
in

Nuclear War - India vs. Pakistan

Welcome to the largest Hyderabadi forum on earth! Start discussions about anything from cool eat-outs and value gyms to terrorism, seek help, plan outings, make friends, and generally have fun!

Moderator: The Moderator Team

Nuclear War - India vs. Pakistan

by MOIN » Thu May 23, 2002 12:30 am

Let\'s always pray for the best, but the conditions are getting worse each day. Can anyone predict the outcome if the war starts - how far will it help the arch rivals who find no option except that unwanted task? And can anyone suggest an alternative for this hatred, and the unlikely atomic war? Is there still any chance for table talks?
MOIN
Guest
 

Nuclear War - India vs. Pakistan

by lucifer_in_desiguise » Thu May 23, 2002 12:30 am

Moin bhai, it is very unfortunate to have this situation now, but I believe both countries should not talk anymore and show only action. We all know how miserably talks have failed in the past, and it is the time for us to go to war, and finish these differences once and for all.
lucifer_in_desiguise
Guest
 

Nuclear War - India vs. Pakistan

by Inquilabi » Thu May 23, 2002 12:30 am

The Nuclear War is inevitable between India and Pakistan.
Guys this is a fact we all will realise soon even though deep inside i hope not. But let us take the factors characters playing in the theatre right now into consideration.
A crazy illitrate dictator in pakistan.
An immense communal and dangerous govt in India.
People divided in both the countries over various facts including religion and land.
India and Pakistan are trying to threaten the world and hold it hostage.Both have nuclear Arsenal and are trigger happy.Both side have large population which will become scape goat for their experiments.
Look Now we have all the ingredients for a nuclear war with government on each side ready to blame the other.
CRAZY ain\'t it NO not at all.
The governments know what they are up to and cannot play Bluff all the time .Some day ONE SIDE WILL CALL and that day all the innocents will pay the price.
Down with all those who believe in Nuclear Arsenal.
The effects of which only few realize.
Inquilabi
Guest
 

Nuclear War - India vs. Pakistan

by Kulcha Hyderabadi » Thu May 23, 2002 12:30 am

Bravo Lucifer! from the comfort of an air-conditioned office and million miles away from the battle front....its easy to express these kind of thoughts..... War brings no good to anybody and all this dirty game is being played by those dirty politicians. A bunch of fools on both sides who will go any length to protect their seat of power. A bunch of lunatics, mindless and thoughtless morons.

For a common man on the street the need of the hour is different. He needs to earn his daily bread, feed his children, send them to school etc. etc. And war is nothing but destruction and misery. There is no once for all solution, we are not taking about erasing names and conflicts from a black board.....The fall-out of a Nuclear War will be terrible for both India and Pakistan. Lets hope for all those who are going to die, for those hundreds and thousands of widows and orphans....lets hope that the current crisis does not flare up into a full scale war.
Kulcha Hyderabadi
Guest
 

Nuclear War - India vs. Pakistan

by lucifer_in_dsiguise » Thu May 23, 2002 12:30 am

Hey Kulcha, ur thoughts are good man... But you were talking about only a common man - think about those other ppl, the so-called militants. These parasites never let the common man lead a happy life... and in the process of eliminating these viruses if some innocents get killed, we cannot help it... There should be an outright war. Do you think America commited a blunder in waging a war against Afghanisthan? No. You have to understand that some things can be achieved only thru your muscle, that the terrorist is never civilized enuff to understand the law. Wage a war and kill him... That is the best sol possible.
lucifer_in_dsiguise
Guest
 

Nuclear War - India vs. Pakistan

by Kulcha Hyderabadi » Thu May 23, 2002 12:30 am

Agreed... Militant parasites are a way of life and you got to live with them. We had World Wars... pray tell me, did we manage to eliminate those ills for which we fought those wars! To start with, I would rather work on analysing the causes of the current discontent rather than trying to treat the effects. A thorough and objective cause and effect analysis will provide us a starting point to resolve these issues. I hope better sense prevails and leaders on both sides work in this direction rather than beating war drums. Now about American adventure in Afghanistan...I would have saluted the brave Americans had they shown the same kind of bravado against a strong nation like Russia in yesteryears or China now. Shooting sitting ducks with most sophisticated weapons is not my idea of warfare! But then, we have our own opinions. Have a good day mate. Its KULCHA not KUTCHA.....
Kulcha Hyderabadi
Guest
 

Nuclear War - India vs. Pakistan

by Kiran » Thu May 23, 2002 12:30 am

Well Inquilabi....well said...hope that day neve comes
Kiran
Guest
 

Nuclear War - India vs. Pakistan

by bhaimiya (ex-udhas) » Thu May 23, 2002 12:30 am

I am totally agree with the comments of Kulcha and Inquilabi. Welldone both of you.
bhaimiya (ex-udhas)
Guest
 

Nuclear War - India vs. Pakistan

by Ucchu Mian » Sat May 25, 2002 12:30 am

Moin Pasha, Tumhare sawaal ke jawaab mein eik do sheir sunataon..

Ghundaon ki hukumat hai har mulk mein har ghar mein :
Ab amn ke haami ko sarkaar se khatra hai : Dushman se nahin khatra apnon se shikayat hai : Khud apne vaziron ke kirdar se khatra hai ::
Ucchu Mian
Guest
 

Nuclear War - India vs. Pakistan

by Mother » Sat May 25, 2002 12:30 am

Well said Ucchu Mian! I am scared of our so called (corrupted,immoral,debased etc. ==> Neech Kameene) leaders. If a war breaks out, I will be blaming Indian leaders ... not Pakistani leaders.Coz I know, if I point out one finger at Pakistan, 4 fingers will be pointing towards me(India).
FYI:I am not a Pakistani
Sorry for the language...kids please don\'t read this
Mother
Guest
 

Nuclear War - India vs. Pakistan

by Raju » Sat May 25, 2002 12:30 am

Hi Guys... It seems so senseless to fight with an enemy like Pakisthan... it has no ecomomy... no identity... wants to fight with India...I Pray God to give some commonsense to the public of that country... There are better things to do... No country can afford war. Nobody wins war.
There is absoultely no reason for war... we need a negotiation... US has the power to get pak down... and the world knows that Pak is promoting terror on both sides of its borders.
Only God can save....
Raju
Guest
 

Nuclear War - India vs. Pakistan

by Bhaijaan » Sat May 25, 2002 12:30 am

Lucifer, I will suggest you that the real parasites are inside India like RSS/VHP/Bajrang Dal, our top priority is to pesticide the internal parasites before screaming on others.
Bhaijaan
Guest
 

Nuclear War - India vs. Pakistan

by bhaijaan » Sat May 25, 2002 12:30 am

Uchhu Mian kiya kehne, bohut khoob, I agree with you.
bhaijaan
Guest
 

Nuclear War - India vs. Pakistan

by lucifer_in_dsiguise » Mon May 27, 2002 12:30 am

hi mother....fortunately Indians have elected a govt, which is clean of corruption so far.....oof remeber the prv PV\'s scam Govt ....

n also ur concept of 1:4 fingers....hmmm......please mother think once more , does it really apply in the current situation???

Unfortunately in india itself we have ppl who do not support there leaders at crucial junctures, bad luck to INdia , secularism/democrasy , now i feel has its own cost....
lucifer_in_dsiguise
Guest
 

Nuclear War - India vs. Pakistan

by Kulcha Hyderabadi » Mon May 27, 2002 12:30 am

Raju, u r right that Pakistan has no economy, no nothing... but my dear friend, that is exactly the reason why we need to have good relations. You see, a poor, hungry, illiterate but belligerent neighbor with nuclear arms is not good news. What is needed is to develop a mutual trust between us. For Pakistan, they must understand this fact that India is a stronger and a healthier nation and for us, we need to put this message accross the border that they stand to gain a lot by being our friends. We can provide them support in several fields. India should assume the role of a compassionate Big Brother while Pakistan should stop irking us. This should be the long-term strategy. Not only with Pakistan, we must have similar attitude of friendship with all our neighbors. India should use its economic, human resources, scientific, educational strength to its advantage. Use \"Carrot and Stick\" policy effectively. Dont shut your door on negotiations, dont severe communication. Talk to them, put sense into them. Build trust, let them know that we are not petty. Lets not have tunnel vision. Learn lessons from Europe. Over 27 million people killed in world wars! They bombed the daylights out of each other during that horrific period and now they have realized that power and strength lies in being united. Just think of it, if India and Pakistan were to be good neighbors, the money we can save thru reductions in defense spending. Valuable resources can be utilized for the benefit of common man on the street. The priorities are primary education, health care, clean drinking water, eradication of child labor, reasonable public distribution system... Unfortunately, nobody is thinking on these lines. Forget about USA or any other country. Their primary interest is to keep the conflict alive in order to sell more arms. They (USA and others) are out to suck every drop of blood from us and will dump us like garbage once we are outta resources. If you dont believe this, read history. Cuba, Nicaragua, Colombia, Vietnam, Phillippines.... the list goes on. America is a friend of nobody and to rely on nobody\'s friend is the biggest folly. I dont blame America, every nation works for its own benefit and we must do so too. See what is in the larger interest of the people and let me tell you folks, War has no winners.
Kulcha Hyderabadi
Guest
 

Nuclear War - India vs. Pakistan

by Raju » Tue May 28, 2002 12:30 am

Hi,
I appreciate your views... but before we say anything... everything drops down to the point that- we are at war against terror.
Pakistan cannot accept us as a free growing nation. This has been proven again and again (proxy war, terriost activities, hubbing criminals weapons, drug trading). The country stands on having wars with its neighbours...Afganisthan, India...
It cannot respect treaties and aggements...they have overcome their own leaders words and actions. They totally rely on external support. So what India needs to do is to satisfy that external support so that the tension is calmed down, i feel its an indirect long route.
It cannot accept us as `big brother\' when it has China, and other super powers supporting...if not today atleast during the cold war... I think everybody knows how it all started...
Our neighbours dont have the technology to develop Nukes...they have the weapons to fire them...and I agree that is dangerous...and we are a the verge of having a war.
Raju
Guest
 

Nuclear War - India vs. Pakistan

by bornfree » Mon Jun 03, 2002 12:30 am

A year ago this month (May, 1999), India surprised the CIA -- and nearly everyone else except, perhaps, Pakistan, who seems to have been nearly ready -- by setting off several underground nuclear explosions. Then Pakistan, claiming self-defense, followed suit. But what would actually happen if India and Pakistan had a nuclear exchange?

Most people in India and in Pakistan (and in the U.S.) probably do not know that as many as 9 out of 10 people -- or more -- who die from a nuclear blast, do not die in the explosion itself. Most people probably think that if they die from a nuclear blast, they will simply see a flash and get quickly cooked.

Those within approximately a six square mile area (for a 1 megaton blast) will indeed be close enough to \"ground zero\" to be killed by the gamma rays emitting from the blast itself. Ghostly shadows of these people will be formed on any concrete or stone that lies behind them, and they will be no more. They literally won\'t know what hit them, since they will be vaporized before the electrical signals from their sense organs can reach their brains.

Of the many victims of a nuclear war, these are the luckiest ones, of course.

Outside the circle where people will be instantly vaporized from the initial gamma radiation blast, the light from the explosion (which is many times hotter than the sun) is so bright that it will immediately and permanently blind every living thing, including farm animals (including cows, sacred or otherwise), pets, birds while in flight and not to mention peasants, Maharajah\'s, and Government officials -- and soldiers, of course. Whether their eyes are opened or closed. This will happen for perhaps 10 miles around in every direction (for a 1 megaton bomb) -- further for those who happen to be looking towards the blast at the moment of detonation. Even from fifty miles away, a 1 megaton blast will be many times brighter than the noonday sun. Those looking directly at the blast will have a large spot permanently burned into their retinas, where the light receptor cells will have been destroyed. The huge bright cloud being nearly instantly formed in front of them (made in part from those closer to the blast, who have already \"become death\"), will be the last clear image these people will see.

Most people who will die from the nuclear explosion will not die in the initial gamma ray burst, nor in the multi-spectral heat blast (mostly X-ray and ultraviolet wavelengths) which will come about a tenth of a second after the gamma burst. Nor will the pressure wave which follows over the next few seconds do most of them in, though it will cause bleeding from every orifice. Nor even will most people be killed by the momentary high winds which accompany the pressure wave. These winds will reach velocities of hundreds of miles an hour near the epicenter of the blast, and will reach velocities of 70 miles per hour as far as 6 miles from the blast (for a 1 megaton bomb). The high winds and flying debris will cause shrapnel-type wounds and blunt- trauma injuries.

Together, the pressure wave and the accompanying winds will do in quite a few, and damage most of the rest of the people (and animals, and structures) in a huge circle -- perhaps hundreds of square miles in area.

Later, these people will begin to suffer from vomiting, skin rashes, and an intense unquenchable thirst as their hair falls out in clumps. Their skin will begin to peel off. This is because the internal molecular structure of the living cells within their bodies is breaking down, a result of the disruptive effects of the high radiation dose they received. All the animals will be similarly suffering. Since they have already received the dose, these effects will show up even if the people are immediately evacuated from the area -- hardly likely, since everything around will be destroyed and the country would be at war.

But this will not concern them at this time: Their immediate threat after the gamma blast, heat blast, pressure wave and sudden fierce wind (first going in the direction of the pressure wave -- outwardly from the blast -- then a moment later, a somewhat weaker wind in the opposite direction), will be the firestorm which will quickly follow, with its intense heat and hurricane-force winds, all driving towards the center where the radioactive mushroom-shaped cloud will be rising, feeding it, enlarging it, and pushing it miles up into the sky.

The cloud from a 1 megaton blast will reach nearly 10 miles across and equally high. Soon after forming, it will turn white because of water condensation around it and within it. In an hour or so, it will have largely dissipated, which means that its cargo of death can no longer be tracked visually. People will need to be evacuated from under the fallout, but they will have a hard time knowing where to go. Only for the first day or so will visible pieces of fallout appear on the ground, such as marble-sized chunks of radioactive debris and flea-sized dots of blackened particles. After that the descending debris from the radioactive cloud will become invisible and harder to track; the fallout will only be detectible with geiger counters carried by people in \"moon suits\". But all the moon suits will already be in use in the known affected area. Probably, no one will be tracking the cloud. One U.S. test in the South Pacific resulted in a cigar-shaped contamination area 340 miles long and up to 60 miles wide. It spread 20 miles *upwind* from the test site, and 320 miles downwind. Where exactly it goes all depends on the winds and the rains at the time. It is difficult to predict where the cloud will travel before it happens, and it is likewise difficult to track the cloud as it moves and dissipates around the globe. While underground testing is bad enough for the environment, a single large above- ground explosion is likely to result in measurable global increases of a whole spectrum of health effects. India or Pakistan will deny culpability for these deaths, of course. The responsible nations, including my own, always do.

But the people who were affected by the blast itself will not be worrying about the fallout just yet.

A 1 megaton nuclear bomb creates a firestorm that can cover 100 square miles. A 20 megaton blast\'s firestorm can cover nearly 2500 square miles. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were small cities, and by today\'s standards the bombs dropped on them were small bombs.

The Allied firebombing of nearly 150 cities during World War Two in Germany and Japan seldom destroyed more than 25 square miles at a time, and each of those raids required upwards of 400 planes, and thousands of crewmembers going into harm\'s way. It was not done lightly. And, they did not leave a lingering legacy of lethal radioactive contamination.

In the span of a lunch hour, one multi-warhead nuclear missile can destroy more cities than all the incendiary raids in history, and the only thing the combatant needs to do to carry off such a horror is to sit in air-conditioned comfort hundreds or even thousands of miles away, and push a button. He would barely have to interrupt his lunch. With automation, he wouldn\'t even have to do that! The perpetrator of this crime against humanity may never have seen his adversary. He only needs to be good at following the simplest of orders. A robot could do it. One would think, that ONLY a robot WOULD do it.

Nuclear war is never anything less than genocide.

The developing firestorm is what the survivors of the initial blast will be worrying about -- if they can think straight at all. Many will have become instantly \"shell-shocked\" -- incapacitated and unable to proceed. Many will simply go mad. Perhaps they are among the \"lucky\" ones, as well.

The firestorm produces hurricane-force winds in a matter of minutes. The fire burns so hot that the asphalt in the streets begins to melt and then burn, even as people are trying to run across it, literally melting into the pavement themselves as they run. Victims, on fire, jump into rivers, only to catch fire again when they surface for air. Yet it is hard to see even these pitiable souls as the least lucky ones in a nuclear attack.

For the survivors of the initial blast who do not then die in the firestorm that follows, many will die painfully over the next few weeks, often after a brief, hopeful period where they appear to be getting better. It might begin as a tingling sensation on the skin, or an itching, which starts shortly after the blast. These symptoms are signs that the body is starting to break down internally, at the molecular level. The insides of those who get a severe dose of gamma radiation, but manage to survive the other traumas, whose organs had once been well defined as lungs, liver, heart, intestines, etc., begin to resemble an undefined mass of bloody pulp. Within days, or perhaps weeks, the victim, usually bleeding painfully from every hole and pore in their body, at last dies and receives their final mercy.

But this too will probably not be how most victims of a nuclear attack will die.

A significant percentage, probably most, of the people who die from a nuclear attack will die much later, from the widespread release of radioactive material into the environment. These deaths will occur all over the world, for centuries to come. Scattered deaths, and pockets of higher mortality rates, will continue from cancer, leukemia, and other health effects, especially genetic damage to succeeding generations.

Nuclear weapons do not recognize the end of a war, or signed peace treaties, or even the deaths of all the combatants. They simply keep on killing a percentage of whoever happens to inhale or ingest their deadly byproducts.

Some deaths will occur hundreds and even thousands of miles away, because low levels of ionizing radiation are capable of causing the full spectrum of health effects, albeit at a lower rate within the population. Not to mention the radioactive runoff from the rivers and streams that flow through the blast area and the area under the radioactive mushroom cloud\'s drift. It may carry its deadly cargo for thousands of miles, raining a fallout of death only on some cities, and not on others. It will land upon nations which had not been involved in any way in India\'s dispute with Pakistan. These nations will be mighty hurt and mighty upset.

Nuclear weapons do not recognize international borders.

Finally, an atmospheric blast of a nuclear \"device\" creates an EMP (Electro-Magnetic Pulse) which can be as large as Pakistan or even India -- perhaps even larger than India and Pakistan together. The higher the altitude of the blast, the bigger the circle of damage will be from the EMP. This is a very serious concern for those of us in the high-tech industries, such as myself.

The Electro-Magnetic Pulse will electrify all sorts of metallic structures that are not normally electrified except by the occasional short circuit or lightening strike. This will be a lot like the whole country getting struck by lightening all at the same time.

As computer chips make better and better use of \"real estate\", using more and more delicate electronic circuits, the more tightly-packed transistors, capacitors, diodes and resistors become more and more vulnerable to the EMP which will be carried into the chips via the connecting wires. The Electro-Magnetic Pulse is one of the reasons above-ground testing was stopped. (The other reason was that it became impossible to deny that the radiation dispersed by the tests was killing people.)

Pacemakers, for example, may stop working because of the \"hit\" from the EMP. It will be quite something to see people in a thousand mile radius of the epicenter of the blast (or further) who are using pacemakers, suddenly drop dead, and all the computers permanently go down and all the lights go out, all at the same time. And commercial and private aircraft will drop out of the sky, since their sensitive electronics and fly-by-wire systems are not very well shielded from the EMP. These planes will then not be available for evacuation purposes, nor will they be available to air-drop food, water, morphine and cyanide, all of which will be in great demand throughout the area.

A year ago people were dancing in the streets over this in both India and Pakistan. Why?

Home plumbing systems and most other plumbing systems are good examples of large metallic structures that will suddenly become electrified, destroying the motors, gauges, electronics, etc. which are attached to the plumbing systems. More and more pumping equipment is computer controlled nowadays for efficiency. Imbedded controllers are becoming prevalent but as they do, the potential damage from the Electro-Magnetic Pulse increases dramatically.

Train tracks will also carry the charge, as well as telephone wiring. All these things will have a nearly simultaneous surge of energy sent through them, igniting gas containers such as fuel storage tanks, propane tanks, and so on. Whatever doesn\'t blow up will at least stop working.

I think the world would be a better place if we all stopped and said, \"I will not be a part of this. I do not need these weapons, for I would never commit this sin against my own children, nor against my neighbor\'s children, nor against my enemy\'s children, nor even against my enemy. I choose not to be a part of this madness.\"

There is a greater battle mankind must fight than against each other. Humanity\'s fight right now, is for humanity\'s general survival despite depleted and poorly used resources, environmental degradation (there is none greater than that from a nuclear explosion), dwindling effectiveness of antibiotics and other wonder drugs, an uneven distribution of available food, knowledge and wealth, and against weapons of mass destruction.


Perhaps these excuses are insufficient, but India and Pakistan hasn\'t even got them. India can, and therefore should, along with Pakistan, renounce nuclear weapons and the nuclear option. Perhaps her populace does not understand the full nature of the threat of nuclear weapons, and thus they are dancing in the streets, but I hope that her leaders do. However, I strongly suspect most of them are unaware of the things I have written about in this newsletter. Perhaps you, dear reader, will help me to educate them in this matter.
bornfree
Guest
 



Return to The Hyderabadi Planet!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron
ADVERTISEMENT
SHOUTBOX!
{{todo.name}}
{{todo.date}}
[
]
{{ todo.summary }}... expand »
{{ todo.text }} « collapse
First  |  Prev  |   1   2  3  {{current_page-1}}  {{current_page}}  {{current_page+1}}  {{last_page-2}}  {{last_page-1}}  {{last_page}}   |  Next  |  Last
{{todos[0].name}}

{{todos[0].text}}

ADVERTISEMENT
This page was tagged for
nuclear attack on hyderabad in 2002
Follow fullhyd.com on
Copyright © 2023 LRR Technologies (Hyderabad) Pvt Ltd. All rights reserved. fullhyd and fullhyderabad are registered trademarks of LRR Technologies (Hyderabad) Pvt Ltd. The textual, graphic, audio and audiovisual material in this site is protected by copyright law. You may not copy, distribute or use this material except as necessary for your personal, non-commercial use. Any trademarks are the properties of their respective owners.